Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 1;42(4):347–357.

Table 4:

Summary of studies of cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women of other age groups. All the studies used secondary data for modeling

Author, year Country Perspective Model Intervals, age groups Results*
Hall et al., 1992 (20) Australia Health system Decision tree Biennial 45–69 years $7190
Carter et al., 1993 (39) Australia Health system MISCAN Annual 40–49 plus biennial 50–69;
Biennial 40–49 plus triennial 50–69;
Biennial 40–69
$ 27257
$19919
$20300
Rosenquist et al., 1994 (31) USA Health system Markov Annual 40–85;
Annual 50–85
$18600
$16800
Lindfors et al., 1995 (34) USA Health system Markov Seven different age group scenarios From $16000 to $31900
Szeto et al., 1996 (50) New Zealand Health system MICROLIFE Biennial 45–64 $15169
Rosenquist et al., 1998 (35) USA Societal Markov Four different age group scenarios From $16100 to $18800
Woo et al., 2007 (29) Hong Kong Societal Decision tree Biennial 50–74;
Biennial 40–74;
Annual 50–74;
Annual 40–74
$90771,
$107310,
$321608,
$385092, per DALY averted
Wong et al., 2007 (30) Hong Kong Societal Markov Biennial 40–69 $64400, or $61600 per QALY gained
Okonkwo et al., 2008 (28) India Health system MISCAN Once at age 40;
Biennial 40–60
$6496, and $3468; or $110542 and $46021 per death averted
Lee et al., 2009 (52) Korea Health system Stochastic Triennial 45–65 $100007 per cancer detected
*

Reported costs are “per life year gained” unless otherwise specified.