Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 23;26(6):878–895. doi: 10.1021/tx400021f

Table 5. Known Estrogenic and Nonestrogenic Compoundsa.

    AC50s (μM)
relative potency chemical name bER hER mERa
inactive atrazine 0 0 0
inactive linuron 0 0 0
inactive haloperidol 0 0 0
inactive phenobarbital sodium salt 0 0 0
inactive progesterone 0 0 0
inactive ketoconazole 0 0 0
  inactive summary 100% 100% 100%
very weak ethylparaben 0 0 0
very weak methoxychlor 0 0 0
very weak butyl benzyl phthalate 0 0 0
  very weak summary 0% 0% 0%
weak 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol 33.000 7.200 8.200
weak kepone 0 0 0
weak genistein 0.130 0.032 0.130
weak 4-cumylphenol 16.000 0 12.000
weak bisphenol B 0.430 0.300 0.023
weak o,p-DDT 0 0 0
weak bisphenol A 0.630 0.820 1.100
weak 4-nonylphenol, branched 33.000 20.000 5.600
weak butylparaben 56.999 17.000 23.000
  weak summary 78% 67% 78%
strong 17β-estradiol 0.023 0.023 0.023
strong diethylstilbestrol 0.023 0.023 0.023
strong 17α-ethinylestradiol 0.023 0.023 0.023
  strong summary 100% 100% 100%
antagonist tamoxifen 0.100 0.330 0.200
  antagonist summary 100% 100% 100%
a

The chemicals are listed along with their relative potency for the estrogen receptor (as noted within the EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program) and calculated AC50 values for the three estrogen assays. The summary for each potency category indicates the percent of chemical–AC50 combinations that were correctly identified in the HTS.