Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 11;7:1109–1144. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S40268

Table S1.

Studies found for interventions of uveitic macular edema

Study Type Intervention Control Size (eyes) Result Complications Follow-up (months)
Leder et al63 RS Periocular injection Nil 126 ME resolution 57%, 23 eyes failed repeated injections IOP increase 43%, 4 required glaucoma filtration surgery, cataracts 17%, scleral perforation with subsequent subretinal corticosteroid deposition and retinal detachment was noted in 1 of 155 12
Venkatesh et al14 RCT Periocular injection, 3 types Types 30 Group 1 improvement, P = 0.00 IOP increase in 3 groups 3
Jea et al17 RS (S) Periocular injection Nil 85 Outcome IOP IOP increased significantly, P = 0.001 3
Yoshikawa et al64 RS Periocular injection Nil 39 VA improvement, two lines 56.4%; VA improvement at 6 months 68% Cataract 15.3%, glaucoma in 2.5%, blepharoptosis 2.5% 6
Bae et al68 RS IVTA/IVB/PSTA Tx 31 IVT better than IVB and PSTA nonsignificant IOP 45% IVT, 10% IVB, 40% PSTA 5.6
Soheilian et al57 RCT IVTA/IVB Tx 31 VA improved in both groups, no significant difference between groups Posterior subcapsular cataract increase was significant in IVT group 9
Soheilian et al57 CCS IV diclofenac Nil 10 Improved VA 50%, P = 0.07; nil change in CMT Nil 2
Roesel104 RS IVT/OFTA Tx 97 VA improvement 18% (IVTA) and 20% (OFTA) after 12 months IOP 22% in IVTA group, cataract progression 68% in IVTA group, and 27% in OFTA 12
Maca et al75 RS IVTA Nil 24 VA 37.5%, resolution ME 29.3% IOP increase > 25 mmHg, 25% cataract progression 26.6% 11 ± 8
Lasave et al67 RS IVTA/IVB Nil 36 VA improvement – IVT P = 0.01, IVB P = 0.03
CMT improvement in IVT group, P = 0.0004
Increase in IOP in IVT group, no CVA, TIA, or MI 6
Dong et al74 RS IVTA Nil 8 Improvement in VA, P = 0.13; 75% ME, P = 0.04 IOP increase in 25% 9
Sallam et al72 RCS IVTA Nil 41 VA improvement, P < 0.01 46% IOP increase, cataract 7
Hogewind105 RCS IVTA Nil 33 VA improved in 48% of intermediate uveitis group and 32% of the posterior uveitis group 12 eyes had an increase in IOP > 21 mmHg, 36% cataract surgery 10.6
Morrison et al77 CCS IVT in px with AIDS Observed patients 8 Improvement in VA 35% compared to 13% in observed group; P = 0.04 IOP increase in 11% treated group, 2% in observed group 9
Choudhry and Ghosh8 CCS IVTA/PSTA Tx 20 VA improved 88.9% vs 77.8%, P = 0.53; ME resolution, no difference, 6 months, P = 0.53 IOP recorded was greater in the eyes that received IVTA than those that received PSTA (P < 0.001) 6
Atmaca et al71 CT IVTA Nil 10 Improvement: 70% VA, 80% ME IOP increase in 60% 15.6
Das-Bhaumik and Jones70 RCS IVTA Nil 33 24/33 improvement (80%) IOP increase in 22% 13.5
Kok et al69 RS IVTA Nil 65 Mean improvement 0.26 IOP increase in 43.1% 8
Angunawela et al6 RS IVTA Nil 12 Improvement: 58% VA, 100% ME IOP increase in 41.6% 40.5
Androudi et al76 RS IVTA Nil 20 Improvement: VA 55%, ME 50% complete IOP controlled, cataract progression in 3 out of 15 8
Smithen106 S (RCS) IVTA Nil 89 36 patients (40.4%) experienced a pressure elevation to 24 mmHg or higher at a mean of 100.6 days (SD 83.1 day) after treatment; glaucomatous
patient 50% IOP rise
10
Karacorlu et al73 CT IVTA Nil 10 Improvement: 80% VA, 36.4% ME IOP increase 30%; no cataract progression or injection-related complications were encountered 7.2
Young et al66 CT IVTA Nil 6 Resolution of ME IOP increase (30 mmHg) in 5 patients 6
Antcliff et al7 CT IVTA Nil 6 ME resolution 83% IOP increased, 1 patient required trabeculectomy 3–12
Lowder et al18 (posterior uveitis) RCT Dexamethasone IV implant 0.7 mg, 0.35 mg, and sham 229 Vitreous haze improved. CMT was recorded but no data on patients with specific macular edema. VA improved in interventions, P < 0.01 IOP increased, requiring medication in 23% 0.7 mg group; cataracts 15% and 12%; conjunctival heme and ocular irritation; single case of possible culture-negative endophthalmitis or uveitis flare (0.7 mg DEX implant group); 4 retinal detachments (2 in the 0.7 mg DEX implant group and 2 in the sham group) 6.2
Kempen et al25 (posterior and panuveitis) RCT Fluocinolone acetonide implant (implant therapy) (255 eyes) Systemic corticosteroids plus immunosuppression 734 P = 0.16, 95% confidence interval on difference in improvement between groups, −1.2 to 6.7 letters). An improvement in vision-related quality of life of 11.4 and 6.8 units (P = 0.043), a change in EuroQol-EQ5D health utility of 0.02 and –0.02 (P = 0.060) Over the 24-month period, implant-assigned eyes had a higher risk of cataract surgery (80%, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.3, P = 0.0001), treatment for elevated intraocular pressure (61%, HR = 4.2, P = 0.0001), and glaucoma (17%, HR = 4.2, P = 0.0008) 24
Pavesio et al21 RCT IV fluocinolone acetonide implant Standard care (SOC) 140 Delayed and lower rate of recurrence P = 0.01 IOP requiring surgery 21.2%
Cataracts, 87.8% of phakic eyes
36
Jaffe24 (chronic uveitis) CT Fluocinolone acetonide sustained drug-delivery implant in patients with recurrence Nil 17 The mean Snellen VA 12 months after the second implant insertion was 20/78, compared with 20/400 at the time of the original fluocinolone implant placement (P = 0.04) 1/17 had a tractional retinal detachment, 1/17 had endophthalmitis 12
Callanan et al20 RCT IV fluocinolone acetonide implant, 0.59 mg and 2.1 mg Nonimplanted eye 278 Reduction in ME in 86% and 73% of the implanted eyes compared to 28% and 28% of the fellow nonimplanted eye for the 0.59 mg FA dose, reduction of 70% and 45% of implanted eyes compared to 27% and 22% of the fellow non implanted eye for the 2.1 mg FA dose; P = 0.01
CMO decreased significantly: P = <0.01
Glaucoma surgery was required in 40%, cataracts were extracted in 93% of phakic implanted eyes, lysis of the anchoring suture 1/278, endophthalmitis 1/278, spontaneous dissociation of the cup and strut 1/278 36
Kuppermann et al59 RCT IV dexamethasone (DDS) Observed patients 27 10-letter improvement in 54% of DDS patients compared to 14% observed patients Eye pain and irritations; vitreous heme, vitreous disorders, increased IOP and conjunctival heme was significantly more in the intervention group compared to the observed group 3.21
Goldstein107 S FA implants Nil 584 71.0% of implanted eyes had an IOP increase of 10 mmHg or more than baseline and 55.1%, 24.7%, and 6.2% of eyes reached an IOP of 30 mmHg or more, 40 mmHg or more, and 50 mmHg or more, respectively; was controlled by surgery and medication 36
Jaffe et al22 (posterior uveitis) RCT IV FA implant Dose 0.59 mg or 2.1 mg 278 VA improved in 87%. 0.53 logMAR (20/68); this improved significantly to 0.45 logMAR (20/55) by 34 weeks (P < 0.001) 51% required ocular antihypertensives, 5.8% glaucoma filtration surgery, 9.9% cataract surgery 8.5
Jaffe et al23 (posterior uveitis) RCT IV FA implant Dose 0.59 mg or 2.1 mg 36 VA improved 0.81 logMAR units (20/125) at 30 months (P = 0.05) IOP rise 56.1%, 19.4% patients had glaucoma filtration surgery, 50% cataracts 22.45
Missotten28 RCS Octreotide Nil 20 ME resolution 36.4% after 1 year Elevated liver enzymes, unstable glycemic control 12
Kafkala et al27 CCS Octreotide Nil 9 ME resolution 78%, VA improved in 78% Nil 12.4
Papadaki et al110 RS Octreotide Nil 2 Partial resolution of ME Gastrointestinal upset, transient pain at the injection site 6
Schilling et al111 RCS Acetazolamide Nil 45 VA improved: P = 0.012, P = 0.025 Nil 37.2
Lashay et al62 RCT Acetazolamide (Behçet’s) Placebo crossover 67 FFA improved: P = 0.99, VA P = 0.53 Mild nausea and pins and needles in a few patients; all continued treatment 3
Cox108 CCS Acetazolamide Nil 41 16 patients responded with improvement with VA Paresthesia, nausea, altered taste, and mild depression 30
Whitcup et al60 RCT Acetazolamide Placebo 40 Reduced ME (P = 0.01) no difference in VA 92% adverse drug reactions 4
Farber et al61 RCT Acetazolamide Placebo 30 Statistically significant improvement in VA was seen at 14 and 28 days in the treated patients Paresthesia, nausea, drowsiness, weight loss, chronic fatigue, cutaneous allergic reaction 1
Meyer et al34 S Anti-VEGF IV rhegmatogenous RD 35,942 N/A Rhegmatogenous RD 0.013% incidence 3
Mirshahi et al85 CCS IVB Nil 12 VA improved 58%, P < 0.05; ME P = 0.64 Nil 4
Lott et al88 RCS IVB Nil 34 Nil significant change Nil 7
Al-Dhibi89 RCS IVB Nil 1 child VA improved, ME improved but recurred Nil 2
Acharya et al82 CCS IVR Nil 7 Improved ME, P = 0.03 Nil 6
Mackensen et al81 RS IVB Nil 10 Improved ME, P = 0.0082; VA nonsignificant One patient’s preexisting cataract progressed after two injections 1
Fintak et al32 S IVB/IVR endophthalmitis N/A 12,585 of IBV 14320I of IVR N/A Endophthalmitis 0.02% incidence 1
Ziemssen et al83 RS IVB Nil 6 Nil change in ME or VA Rupture retinal cyst 12
Cordero Coma et al84 RS IVB Nil 13 ME 46.15%, P = 0.02; VA 38.4%, P = 0.05 Nil 3
Cervantes-Castañeda et al87 RCS IVB Nil 29 VA improved, P = 0.0045; ME P = 0.0007 Nil 12
Wang et al38 RS Efalizumab S/C Nil 1 Resolved ME Pain in the left hip joint, short-term-memory loss, inability to perform multitasking activities, twitching in the right arm 6
Parie et al112 RCS Interferon-α Nil 6 Improved VA and ME Not known
Androudi et al35 CCS IV adalimumab Nil 8 No improvement in VA or ME Nil 6
Taylor et al92 CCS Methotrexate Nil 15 VA improved, 5 relapsed and improved with reinjection 1 dense posterior capsular plaque that needed vitrectomy and surgical capsulotomy, 1 epitheliopathy 6
Neri109 RCS Mycophenolate Nil 19 96.9% had no ME on FFA and OCT, 3 recurrences Tiredness 26.3%, headache 21%, dizziness 15.8%, anorexia 21%, dyspepsia 31.6%, raised cholesterol 5.3% 12
Deuter et al40 RS Interferon-α-2A 24 ME resolution 62.5% in 3 months Flu-like symptoms, fatigue, or increased liver enzymes 6
Fukuda et al91 RS Etanercept Nil 2 Improved ME and VA Not known 4
Bodaghi et al41 RS Interferon-α Nil 45 Control in 59%–82.6%; oral prednisolone decreased significantly (P = 0.001), relapses in 5 cases 2 (5.13%) had major side effects – severe depression and major neutropenia; minor side effects were flu-like symptoms, coughing, arthralgias, thyroiditis and Raynaud’s phenomenon 24.2
Hardwig et al51 RCS Methotrexate Nil 6 uveitis 12/16 VA improvement, 4 lost acuity PCNSL 4.2
Deuter et al40 CT Interferon-α-2A Nil 15 Resolution of ME in 11, improved VA 13 Flu-like symptoms, fatigue, hair loss, and increased liver enzymes in 3–7 patients 0.5–1
Markomichelakis et al37 CSS Infliximab Nil 14 VA improved, P = 0.00001; ME P = 0001 Nil 6
Gutfleisch et al55 RS PPV and IVT Nil 19 Improved VA in 44%, worse in 12% Cataract progression, 85% of phakic eyes; increased IOP 27% at 6 weeks, 11% at 12 months 12
Tranos et al58 RCT PPV Standard care 23 Improved VA significantly, P = 0.011 1 peripheral retinal break was treated with laser; 2 eyes with ocular hypertension treated with drops 6
Sonoda et al93 RCS PPV and IVT Nil 6 Improved VA, 83% Increased IOP 17% 7
Wiechens et al94 RCS PPV Nil 42 ME resolution 42.8%, VA 50.0% ERM 2.3%, glaucoma 4.6%, RD 7.12% 20.2
Kiryu et al95 RCS PPV Nil 18 VA improved 56%, ME 78% (slit lamp, not OCT) Cataract, glaucoma, optic nerve atrophy, ERM, and TRD
Dugel56 RCS PPV Nil 11 VA improved 64%, ME 82% Cataract formation 9%, glaucoma 18%, ERM 9% 21
Nussenblatt et al96 RCT Vitamin E Placebo 17 No effect Not documented 4
Suttorp-Schulten et al97 CCS Macular grid laser Nil 6 ME reduced, 1 patient significant improvement in VA, 3 eyes were stable, and 2 eyes deteriorated Nil 18

Abbreviations: CCS, clinical case series; CMO, cystoid macular edema; CMT, central macular thickness; CT, clinical trial; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DDS, drug delivery system; DEX, dexamethasone; ERM, epiretinal membrane; EuroQol Eq5D, health score; FA, fluocinolone acetonide; FFA, fundus fluorescein angiography; IOP, intraocular pressure; IV, intravitreal; IVB, intravitreal bevacizumab; IVR, intravitreal ranibizumab; IVT, intravitreal triamcinolone; IVTA, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide; logMAR, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; ME, macular edema; MI, myocardial infarct; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OFTA, orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; PSTA, posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide; px, patient; RCS, retrospective clinical case series; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RD, retinal detachment; RS, retrospective review; S, safety study; S/C, subcutaneous; SD, standard deviation; SOC, standard of care; TIA, transient ischemic attack; TRD, tractional retinal detachment; Tx, treatment; VA, visual acuity; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.