Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 7;13:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-74

Table 5.

Comparison of responses among basic scientists, clinicians and clinician-scientists

 
Basic scientists
Clinicians
Clinicians scientists
 
 
Rare /infrequent
Sometimes
Frequent/all the time
Rare/infrequent
Sometimes
Frequent/all the time
Rare/infrequent
Sometimes
Frequent/all the time
p value
  N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)  
Undesirable experiences
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personal attacks
442 (78.9)
100 (17.9)
18 (3.2)
439 (85.1)
74 (14.3)
3 (0.6)
197 (74.6)
61 (23.1)
6 (2.3)
0.001**
Breach of confidentiality
499 (89.1)
56 (10.0)
5 (0.9)
484 (93.8)
28 (5.4)
4 (0.8)
217 (82.2)
42 (15.9)
5 (1.9)
<0.001**
Unauthorised use of articles’ information after rejection of articles
485 (86.6)
71 (12.7)
4 (0.7)
458 (88.8)
50 (9.7)
8 (1.6)
206 (78.0)
53 (20.1)
5 (1.9)
0.001**
Imposition of unnecessary references
363 (64.8)
154 (27.5)
43 (7.7)
389 (74.5)
99 (19.2)
28 (5.4)
154 (58.3)
85 (32.2)
25 (9.5)
<0.001**
 
Strongly disagree/Disagree
Neutral
Strongly agree/Agree
Strongly disagree/Disagree
Neutral
Strongly agree/Agree
Strongly disagree/Disagree
Neutral
Strongly agree/Agree
p value
 
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
 
Journal peer review is:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
fair
137 (24.5)
166 (29.6)
257 (45.9)
97 (18.1)
137 (26.6)
282 (54.7)
70 (26.5)
84 (31.8)
110 (41.7)
0.004**
transparent
250 (44.6)
176 (31.4)
134 (23.9)
225 (43.6)
152 (29.5)
139 (26.9)
135 (51.1)
65 (24.6)
64 (24.2)
0.2
scientific
117 (20.9)
167 (29.8)
276 (49.3)
119 (23.1)
152 (29.5)
245 (47.5)
68 (25.8)
80 (30.3)
116 (43.9)
0.6
free from interference
283 (50.5)
179 (32.0
98 (17.5)
228 (44.2)
167 (32.4)
121 (23.4)
148 (56.1)
80 (30.3)
36 (13.6)
0.004**
Anonymity of authors
138 (24.6)
115 (20.5)
307 (54.8)
89 (17.2)
99 (19.2)
328 (63.6)
69 (26.1)
50 (18.9)
145 (54.9)
0.009**
Appeal system in every journal 93 (16.6) 100 (17.9) 367 (65.5) 74 (14.3) 95 (18.4) 347 (67.2) 31 (11.7) 40 (15.2) 193 (73.1) 0.2

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.