Table 1.
Clear |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HF | LF | NW | ||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
RTa,b,c,d (ms) |
491.96 | 75.59 | 536.14 | 86.12 | 578.86 | 94.25 |
MD a,b,c,d (ms) |
564.31 | 100.73 | 584.77 | 104.64 | 600.51 | 105.72 |
ACC a,b | .99 | .02 | .96 | .04 | .97 | .03 |
RAU a,b | 113.01 | 5.63 | 105.94 | 8.57 | 105.90 | 7.15 |
Degraded |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HF | LF | NW | |||||
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||
RT a,b,c,d (ms) |
562.42 | 92.45 | 601.97 | 103.77 | 644.84 | 114.48 | |
MD a,b,c,d (ms) |
580.29 | 111.02 | 595.28 | 113.14 | 609.56 | 116.53 | |
ACC a,b | .99 | .02 | .94 | .05 | .97 | .03 | |
RAU a,b | 111.17 | 6.14 | 99.77 | 9.36 | 105.71 | 6.98 |
Note. HF = high frequency; LF = low frequency; NW = Non-word.
A reliable frequency effect (at least p < .05 or better).
A reliable degradation effect when HF and LF words were evaluated (at least p < .05).
A reliable lexicality effect (at least p < .05 or better).
A reliable degradation effect when words and non-words were evaluated (at least p < .05).