Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 18.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):513–520. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0234-x

Table 1.

Mean response latency (RT), movement duration (MD) and accuracy (ACC) as a function of word frequency, lexicality, and stimulus quality

Clear
HF LF NW
M SD M SD M SD
RTa,b,c,d
(ms)
491.96 75.59 536.14 86.12 578.86 94.25
MD a,b,c,d
(ms)
564.31 100.73 584.77 104.64 600.51 105.72
ACC a,b .99 .02 .96 .04 .97 .03
RAU a,b 113.01 5.63 105.94 8.57 105.90 7.15
Degraded
HF LF NW
M SD M SD M SD
RT a,b,c,d
(ms)
562.42 92.45 601.97 103.77 644.84 114.48
MD a,b,c,d
(ms)
580.29 111.02 595.28 113.14 609.56 116.53
ACC a,b .99 .02 .94 .05 .97 .03
RAU a,b 111.17 6.14 99.77 9.36 105.71 6.98

Note. HF = high frequency; LF = low frequency; NW = Non-word.

a

A reliable frequency effect (at least p < .05 or better).

b

A reliable degradation effect when HF and LF words were evaluated (at least p < .05).

c

A reliable lexicality effect (at least p < .05 or better).

d

A reliable degradation effect when words and non-words were evaluated (at least p < .05).