Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Mar 26;269(2):100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.03.012

Table 1.

Comparison of CB2R affinity (Ki), potency for AC-Inhibition (IC50) and Fractional Receptor Occupancy (FRO) for 50% AC-Inhibition for JWH-018, JWH-073 and metabolites

Drug CB2R Affinity
(Ki, nM)
Potency for
AC-Inhibition
(IC50, nM)
FRO for 50%
AC-Inhibition
(%)a

CP-55,940 0.4 ± 0.2 (3) 3.3 ± 1.4 (5) 81.7 ± 6.7 (5)
Δ9-THC 14.8 ± 1.5 (3) 57.9 ± 19.8 (5) 71.7 ± 7.8 (5)

JWH-018 5.6 ± 2.4 (3) 3.6 ± 2.2 (6) 19.0 ± 5.3 (5)
M1 20.9 ± 5.1 (4) N.D. N.D.
M2 115.1 ± 23.4 (3) N.D. N.D.
M3 69.3 ± 3.2 (3) N.D. N.D.
M5 47.4 ± 10.1 (3) 17.7 ± 5.5 (4) 25.5 ± 7.2 (4)
M6 >10,000 (3) N.D. N.D.
M7 83.7 ± 10.6 (3) N.D. N.D.

JWH-073 9.8 ± 0.9 (4) 16.9 ± 1.9 (5) 62.5 ± 3.0 (5)
M1 73.4 ± 6.7 (3) N.D. N.D.
M2 184.7 ± 51.8 (8) N.D. N.D.
M3 291.3 ± 96.9 (3) N.D. N.D.
M5 96.0 ± 7.1 (3) 13.3 ± 2.0 (3) 12.1 ± 1.6 (3)
M6 >10,000 (3) N.D. N.D.
M7 31.4 ± 6.7 (3) N.D. N.D.

The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (number of replications)

a

The formula employed to calculate FRO = [DRUG] / (Ki + [DRUG]) (Tallarida, 1990)

N.D. = Not determined