Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jul;143(7):756–763. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0263

TABLE 2.

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of individual Caries-risk Assessment Tool (CAT) elements and caries-risk assessment approaches.*

VARIABLE SENSITIVITY (%) SPECIFICITY (%) POSITIVE
PREDICTIVE
VALUE (%)
NEGATIVE
PREDICTIVE
VALUE (%)

CAT Element
Dental interview
Suboptimal fluoride exposure 7.4 100.0 100.0 53.3
3 between-meal sugar exposures 16.2 86.4 52.8 52.1
Low socioeconomic status 100.0 2.5 49.2 100.0
Recent maternal caries experience 57.2 21.9 40.9 35.1
Special health care needs 2.6 97.5 50.0 51.4
Poor salivary flow 0.9 99.2 50.0 51.4
Clinical evaluation
> 1 area of demineralization 57.2 100.0 100.0 71.2
Gingivitis or visible plaque 94.8 66.9 73.1 93.1
Enamel hypoplasia 5.2 97.1 63.2 52.0
Supplemental assessment
Streptococcus mutans (mutans streptococci [MS]) (moderate or higher levels) 86.5 93.4 92.5 87.9

Caries-risk Assessment Approach CAT 100.0 2.9 49.4 100.0
MS (moderate or higher levels) alone 86.5 93.4 92.5 87.9
CAT excluding socioeconomic status risk factors 85.6 68.6 71.0 83.4
CAT excluding socioeconomic status risk factor plus MS (moderate or higher levels) 95.2 65.7 72.4 93.5
*

Based on the 48.6 percent caries prevalence in the sample.