Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013 Mar 12;17(16):1809–1820. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.767336

Table 2.

The micro-motion and gap thickness of the cement-bone interface from 11 post-mortem retrieved hip replacements was determined previously in an experimental investigation* [11]. This data was used as input into idealized fluid/structure finite element models to determine maximum fluid velocity, pressure, and shear rate.

Experimental Data* Fluid Flow Model Results
Donor Median
Interface
Gap
Thickness
(mm)
Median
Inteface
Shear
Micro-
motion (mm)
Median
Interface
Normal
Micro-
motion (mm)
Cement
Mantle
Minor
Dimension
(mm)
Cement
Mantle
Major
Dimension
(mm)
Velocity
(mm/s)
Pressure
(Pa)
Shear
Rate
(1/s)
A 0.068 0.0041 0.0011 18.0 18.1 0.71 21.82 32.29
B 0.170 0.0057 0.0010 18.7 18.9 0.27 1.39 5.13
C 0.182 0.0221 0.0110 17.7 17.8 2.61 11.14 44.66
D 0.170 0.0264 0.0076 17.9 21.8 2.57 11.39 46.82
E 0.136 0.0035 0.0014 15.2 19.2 0.48 3.02 10.98
F 0.136 0.0033 0.0021 16.3 22.4 0.75 5.56 16.93
G 0.045 0.0031 0.0009 16.9 17.0 0.82 54.16 56.21
H 0.318 0.1656 0.0410 17.9 18.9 6.45 8.46 61.56
I 0.193 0.0331 0.0161 14.8 20.5 3.93 12.69 63.00
J 0.568 0.6940 0.1478 17.8 20.1 15.70 6.48 79.09
K 0.079 0.0019 0.0007 18.0 20.5 0.45 9.75 17.36