Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e66005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066005

Table 3. LC performance on different artificial datasets conditions.

Average degree 4 8 12
pinside EQ PD IGP CN EQ PD IGP CN EQ PD IGP CN
0.9 0.118 0.319 * 0.056 17.1 0.295 * 0.839 * 0.224 7.4 0.289 * 0.616 * 0.146 7.9
0.8 0.111 0.436 * 0.096 16.8 0.148 0.452 * 0.071 21.6 0.177 * 0.586 * 0.098 17.3
0.7 0.086 0.327 * 0.046 14.0 0.088 0.152 * 0.109 27.1 0.090 * 0.557 * 0.118 28.8
0.6 0.086 0.295 * 0.069 16.1 0.078 0.260 * 0.095 31.4 0.016 0.108 0.725 * 14.4
0.5 0.087 0.284 * 0.061 15.5 0.064 0.208 * 0.095 33.7 0.004 0.114 0.901 * 1.0
*

the bold data marked with an asterisk (*) is the best value with the same location in Tables 24.

**

EQ: Extended Quality of modularity; IGP: In-Group-Proportion; PD: Partition Density; CN: Communities Number.

To avoid accidental influence of single artificial network, all types of evaluation values are average values of 10 networks in each condition.