Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2012 Mar 15;39(5):997–1003. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111270

Table 3.

Predicted TNFSF4 haplotypes in systemic sclerosis (SSc), SSc subsets, and healthy controls. Numbers in boldface are significant values.

TNFSF4 Haplotypes rs12039904 rs10912580 rs844648 rs1234317 rs2205960 Frequency in Comparator Frequency in Patients p OR (95% CI)
SSc vs controls
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.51 0.037 1.10 (0.97–1.24)
 2 C A A C G 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.93 (0.79–1.09)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.21 0.048 0.89 (0.76–1.04)
lcSSc vs controls
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.50 0.0022 0.87 (0.76–1.00)
 2 C A A C G 0.18 0.19 0.86 1.01 (0.84–1.22)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.23 0.00046 1.21 (1.02–1.44)
dcSSc vs controls
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.53 1 1.00 (0.83–1.19)
 2 C A A C G 0.18 0.20 0.03 1.13 (0.90–1.42)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.19 0.42 0.95 (0.75–1.20)
lcSSc vs dcSSc
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.50 0.012 0.87 (0.72–1.06)
 2 C A A C G 0.20 0.19 0.13 0.90 (0.70–1.15)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.23 0.0004 1.27 (1.00–1.63)
ACA+ vs controls
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.47 5.53 × 10−7 0.80 (0.67–0.95)
 2 C A A C G 0.18 0.18 1 1.00 (0.80–1.24)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.24 7.71 × 10−7 1.31 (1.07–1.61)
ATA+ vs controls
 1 C A G C G 0.53 0.53 0.88 1.00 (0.82–1.23)
 2 C A A C G 0.19 0.18 0.50 1.04 (0.80–1.34)
 3 T G A T T 0.19 0.19 0.29 0.95 (0.73–1.22)
ACA+ vs ATA+
 1 C A G C G 0.47 0.53 0.0013 1.26 (1.00–1.59)
 2 C A A C G 0.19 0.19 0.78 1.03 (0.76–1.39)
 3 T G A T T 0.24 0.18 0.00011 0.72 (0.53–0.96)

dcSSc: diffuse cutaneous SSc; ATA+: antitopoisomerase I antibodies; lcSSc: limited cutaneous SSc; ACA+: anticentromere antibodies.