Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 26;61(12):1250–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.034

Table 2.

Health Benefits, Costs, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio from Statin Therapy for Patients with Different Age, Sex, and Cardiovascular Risk Profiles

Starting Age 10-Year Probability of MI1 % Increased Cost ($) Gain in QALYs (discounted) Increased life expectancy (undiscounted) (months) Reduced risk of MI or stroke (percent)2 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($/QALY)
Men
50 6 1,700 0.09 1.6 4.4 20,500
55 10 1,800 0.09 1.7 4.8 19,600
60 12 1,800 0.10 1.7 5.0 18,900
65 16 1,800 0.10 1.6 5.1 18,000
70 17 1,500 0.09 1.5 5.0 16,900
75 20 1,300 0.08 1.2 4.7 16,300
80 20 900 0.06 0.9 4.1 16,100
85 20 600 0.04 0.6 3.3 15,400
Women
50 1 1,700 0.03 0.7 2.1 56,800
55 2 1,800 0.04 0.9 2.6 46,200
60 3 1,900 0.05 1.0 3.1 39,200
65 5 1,900 0.06 1.1 3.5 33,400
70 8 1,700 0.06 1.1 3.7 29,300
75 14 1,400 0.06 1.1 3.8 25,000
80 14 1,100 0.05 0.9 3.6 21,300
85 14 700 0.04 0.6 3.0 19,800

For more detailed results see Supplement Table S5. Because costs are rounded to the nearest $100, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios may be slightly different than the incremental costs and QALYs in the table suggest.

1

Based from a Framingham risk score(19)

2

Combined reduction in myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke before development of end-stage renal disease

ATPIII currently recommends that individuals with risk level of 20% or more should be treated with statins. All other groups of CKD patients in the table would not have statin therapy currently recommended if they had no other CV risk equivalents.