Table 3.
Map positions and effect of QTLs detected in RILs
| Trait | Year | Chr | Map position in cM (peak)a | Marker intervalb | LODc | R2 (%)d | Additive effectc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OV | 2008 | I | 10.9–14.9 (11.9) | RES-11–E6M5_148 | 3.5 | 11.8 | 0.79 |
| PS | 2008 | G | 42.0–50.7 (45.0) | RsHH019–E6M4_87 | 3.8 | 10.8 | 0.31 |
| I | 8.5–8.9 (8.5) | RM_42–RES-11 | 6.4 | 20.9 | 0.40 | ||
| 2009 | I | 2.6–3.0 (2.6) | RM_16–E6M5_99 | 3.5 | 16.9 | 0.32 | |
| I | 67.4–75.9 (68.6) | E2M4_196–RsSR094 | 3.2 | 11.9 | −0.27 | ||
| Pub | 2008 | A | 72.2–78.1 (77.1) | RsSR104–RsSA083 | 13.6 | 37.7 | −0.86 |
| C | 42.6–46.1 (44.1) | E1M7_238–Rs2STS1232/TaqI | 9.7 | 24.2 | −0.68 | ||
| 2009 | A | 72.2–78.1 (77.1) | RsSR104–RsSA083 | 12.8 | 34.4 | −0.82 | |
| C | 36.1–38.3 (38.3) | RM_1–E5M8_427 | 10.1 | 25.3 | −0.69 | ||
| WW | 2009 | B | 1.8–2.8 (2.8) | AtSTS-1015–REL-4 | 3.8 | 18.7 | 213.34 |
| UW | 2009 | B | 1.8–2.8 (2.8) | AtSTS-1015–REL-4 | 3.6 | 17.8 | 175.33 |
| RW | 2008 | H | 34.7–35.6 (35.6) | RsHH012–E3M3_77 | 3.7 | 9.3 | −51.95 |
| 2009 | H | 24.9–25.7 (24.9) | RES-1–SLG_CAPS/PleI | 11.6 | 33.9 | −113.01 | |
| I | 48.5–51.9 (48.9) | REL-13–RES-5/HapII | 6.6 | 16.8 | −82.24 | ||
| MW | 2008 | H | 32.7–36.6 (35.6) | RsHH012–E3M2_105 | 8.4 | 25.1 | −53.52 |
| I | 42.2–48.5 (46.2) | E5M4_90–REL-13 | 5.4 | 14.6 | −42.84 | ||
| 2009 | H | 24.9–25.7 (24.9) | RES-1–SLG_CAPS/PleI | 11.7 | 33.9 | −107.27 | |
| I | 48.5–51.9 (48.9) | REL-13–RES-5/HapII | 6.9 | 17.3 | −79.06 |
a
Region above the LOD threshold, in which the peak position is in parentheses.
b
Smallest marker interval flanking a region above the LOD threshold.
c
Scores at the LOD peaks.
d
Phenotypic variation explained by each QTL at the LOD peak.