Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jul;28(7):1666–1678. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1919

Table 4.

Comparison of PR model parameters (Mean±SEM) in subjects with and without vertebral fractures.

Distal Radius Distal Tibia
Fracture Nonfracture P value Fracture Nonfracture P value
HR-pQCT Image BV/TV (%) 13.7±1.1 17.3±1.3 0.04 13.4±1.1 17.9±0.9 0.003
PR Model BV/TV (%) 8.9±0.7 11.3±0.9 0.03 8.8±0.8 11.9±0.6 0.002
% Plate Element Volume 6.3±0.9 9.6±1.7 0.09 13.4±1.4 15.2±1.3 0.4
% Rod Element Volume 93.7±0.9 90.4±1.7 0.09 86.6±1.4 84.8±1.3 0.4
Number of Plate Element 124±25 232±43 0.03 814±112 1238±124 0.01
Number of Rod Element 798±62 987±76 0.06 2588±278 3403±215 0.02
Plate Element Thickness (mm) 0.183±0.002 0.179±0.001 0.04 0.188±0.001 0.185±0.001 0.06
Rod Element Diameter (mm) 0.207±0.001 0.210±0.002 0.3 0.216±0.002 0.219±0.002 0.31
PR Model Generation Time (s) 3.4±0.2 3.1±0.2 0.4 19.7±1.5 17.0±1.0 0.13