Table 2. Mating competitiveness of T. urticae based on the mean number of compatible females and incompatible females.
| Cross type | Died | Not inseminated | Inseminated | ||||
| Compatible | Incompatible | X2 | P | ||||
| A. ♀u×♂u | A1 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 0 | ||
| A2 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 0 | |||
| A3 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | |||
| A4 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 0 | |||
| B. ♀u×♂w | B1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | ||
| B2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |||
| B3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |||
| B4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |||
| C. ♀u×(♂u+♂w) | C1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 0.06 | P>0.05 |
| C2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 0.24 | P>0.05 | |
| C3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 0.06 | P>0.05 | |
| C4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0.25 | P>0.05 | |
Abbreviations: Inseminated, females who had daughters (Only male offspring can be produced by parthenogenesis in T. urticae); compatible, inseminated females that produced hatching eggs; incompatible, inseminated females that produced non-hatching eggs. X 2 test, df = 1. w, infected strain; u, uninfected strain.