Table 3. Percentages contribution (%) of the top 90% discriminating genera of the two field stations and the six experimental groups.
| FIELD | |||||
| HD1 | % | LD2 | % | ||
| 1A 3 | Tricompa sp.1 | 5.38 | 1A | Perepsilonema sp. | 83.61 |
| Perepsilonema sp. | 5.1 | 2A | Microlaimus sp.2 | 4.36 | |
| Ceramonema sp.2 | 1.7 | Metachromadora sp.2 | 1.86 | ||
| 1B | Rhynchonema sp. | 6.23 | Chromadorina sp. | 1.66 | |
| Xyala sp.2 | 5.1 | ||||
| Xyala sp.1 | 4.53 | ||||
| Omicronema sp. | 2.55 | ||||
| 2A | Metachromadora sp.1 | 19.83 | |||
| Desmodora sp.1 | 7.37 | ||||
| Chromadorita sp.1 | 6.51 | ||||
| Metachromadora sp.2 | 6.23 | ||||
| Pomponema sp. | 6.24 | ||||
| Dichromadora sp. | 2.55 | ||||
| Hypodontolaimus sp. | 2.27 | ||||
| Chromaspirinia sp. | 1.98 | ||||
| 2B | Epacanthion sp. | 2.83 | |||
| Odontophora sp. | 1.99 | ||||
| Enoploides sp. | 1.69 | ||||
1
HD = High diversity.
2
LD = Low diversity.
3
1A, 1B, 2A, 2B = Feeding groups according to the classification of Wieser (1953).