Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;14(3):244–269. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.126

Table 13.

Characteristics of Spine Surgery Studies Examining the Relationship between Drains and Surgical Site Infection

Authors Year Study Type Procedure Drain Type Drained n (%) Undrained n (%) Duration of drainage Perioperative antibiotic administration SSI outcome Cultures Comments
Brown et al. 2004 RCT “Extensive” lumbar spine surgery CS 42 (50.6) 41 (49.4) 0%
Chen et al. 2009 Retrospective review Posterior instrumented lumbar arthrodesis 100% Drain: RR 1.843 (95% CI 0.822–4.135) 195 patients included; overall SSI rate: 13.8%; DM and EBL risk factors for SSI
Ho et al. 2007 Retrospective case-control Posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation 73 (57.9) 53 (42.1) 100% 13.2% vs. 38.4%,a p=0.0005 Cases: 36 patients with delayed (>6 mo) infection
Kanayama et al. 2010 Retrospective review Single-level lumbar laminectomy CS 298 (53.2) 262 (46.8) Removed when output <50 mL/d 100% No difference in SSI rates between groups
Payne et al. 1996 RCT Single-level lumbar hemi-laminectomy or decompressive lumbar laminectomy CS 103 (51.5) 97 (48.5) 48 h 100% 1.9% vs. 1.0%,a p=NS S. aureus and Streptococcus isolated
Rao et al. 2011 Retrospective case-control study Posterior approach spinal fusion CS 205 (86.1) 33 (13.9) 92.4% Unit OR 1.6 per day drain present (95% CI 1.3–1.9) MSSA and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus most frequently isolated Cases: 57 patients with deep primary incisional SSI; male gender and higher BMI also risk factors
a

Drained vs. undrained.

BMI=body-mass index; CI=confidence interval; CS=closed-suction; DM=diabetes mellitus; EBL=estimated blood loss' MSSA=methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; OR=odds ratio; RCT=randomized controlled trial; RR=relative risk; SSI=surgical site infection.