Table 3. State level political and corruption classifications.
States | Ruling Party | Affiliation | Affinity level | Pol change between 2008–2012 | Political Swing | Corruption Index |
Andhra Pradesh | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Arunachal Pradesh | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Assam | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Bihar | JD(U) BJP | NDA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Chhattisgarh | BJP | NDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Goa | BJP | NDA | 0 | 1 | −5 | 4 |
Gujarat | BJP | NDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Haryana | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Himachal Pradesh | BJP | NDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Jammu & Kashmir | JKNC | UPA | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Jharkhand | BJP | NDA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Karnataka | BJP | NDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Kerala | INC | UPA | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
Madhya Pradesh | BJP | NDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Maharashtra | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Manipur | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Meghalaya | INC | UPA | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Mizoram | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Orissa | BJD | – | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Punjab | SAD | NDA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Rajasthan | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Sikkim | SDF | – | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Tamil Nadu | AIADMK | – | 2 | 1 | −2 | 3 |
Tripura | CPI (M) | – | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Uttar Pradesh | SP | – | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Uttarakhand | INC | UPA | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
West Bengal | TMC | UPA | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Andaman & Nicobar | UPA | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | Not Available |
Chandigarh | UPA | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli | UPA | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Daman & Diu | UPA | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Lakshadweep | UPA | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Delhi | INC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Pondicherry | INRC | UPA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Source: Political affiliation data compiled from various sources. Corruption Index is from TII-CMS 2007. Affiliation index coded as 0 = BJP (principal opposition party at centre); 1 = National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition partner; 2 = Indian National Congress (INC) is principal opposition party/UPA coalition partner is principal opposition party, at state; 3 = Neutral party; 4 = UPA coalition partner; 5 = ruling party at centre, INC.