Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;2013:783809. doi: 10.1155/2013/783809

Table 1.

Comparison of groups in terms of oxidant and antioxidants parameters in liver tissue.

Groups
CG 
n: 6
TG 
n: 6
TPG 
n: 6
HG 
n: 6
MDA (µmol/g protein) 11 ± 1.4 9 ± 0.5 
P < 0.001*
3 ± 0.5 
P < 0.0001*
2.2 ± 0.48 
P < 0.0001*

MPO (U/g protein) 14 ± 2.1 12.5 ± 2.5 
P > 0.05
4 ± 0.8 
P < 0.0001*
3.1 ± 0.6 
P < 0.0001*

tGSH (nmol/g protein) 2 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 0.4 
P < 0.05*
7 ± 0.8 
P < 0.0001*
9 ± 0.6 
P < 0.0001*

GST (U/g protein) 5 ± 1.5 6.4 ± 1.4 
P > 0.05
14 ± 1.5 
P < 0.0001*
19 ± 1.9 
P < 0.0001*

GPx (U/g protein) 7 ± 0.9 8.2 ± 0.7 
P > 0.05
17 ± 0.6 
P < 0.0001*
18.7 ± 1.9 
P < 0.0001*

GR (U/g protein) 3 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.5 
P > 0.05
11 ± 1.5 
P < 0.0001*
14.5 ± 1.1 
P < 0.0001*

DNA damage product 8-OHGua/Gua (pmol/L) 2.7 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.5 
P > 0.05
1.1 ± 0.3 
P < 0.0001*
0.9 ± 0.3 
P < 0.0001*

*P ≤ 0.05 was significant. ANOVA post hoc—the least significant difference option was used. Group data were compared against the CG group.

Notes: data are mean ± standard deviation. CG: control group; TG: thiamine 20 mg/kg + cisplatin group; TPG: TPP 20 mg/kg + cisplatin group; CG: control group; MDA: malondialdehyde; MPO: myeloperoxidase; tGSH: total glutathione; GST: glutathione S-transferase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GR: glutathione reductase; n: number of animals.