Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Mar 31;54(0 1):S287–S292. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.069

Table 2.

Grey-matter volume comparisons.

Region HR−C Vs HR+C
HR−C Vs HC
HR+C Vs HC
F(1,91 ),p F( 1,136),p F(1,113), p
Intra cranial volume 1.79, 0.195 0.9, 0.693 1.2, 0.429
Left Heschl’s gyrus 3.81, 0.053 2.99, 0.08 p>0.2
Right Heschl’s gyrus 4.92, 0.032 11.22, 0.000 p>0.2
Left supramarginal gyrus 3.28, 0.071 20.06, 0.000 p>0.2
Right supramarginal gyrus p>0.2 6.05, 0.015 p>0.2
Right angular gyrus p>0.2 18.1, 0.000 3.12, 0.070
Left superior parietal gyrus p>0.2 3.43, 0.065 3.62, 0.059
Right superior parietal gyrus p>0.2 8.23, 0.004 4.22, 0.039
Right middle frontal gyrus p>0.2 6.78, 0.010 p>0.2
Right superior frontal gyrus p>0.2 3.96, 0.048 p>0.2
Left inferior frontal gyrus 7.32, 0.001 12.32, 0.000 p>0.2
Right inferior frontal gyrus 4.05, 0.042 3.32, 0.071 p>0.2
Left hippocampus 4.18, 0.039 8.79, 0.000 p>0.2
Right hippocampus 4.11, 0.041 8.02, 0.000 p>0.2
Left caudate 4.71, 0.036 9.09, 0.000 p>0.2
Right caudate 6.45, 0.011 14.21, 0.000 p>0.2
Left thalamus p>0.2 5.67, 0.018 p>0.2
Right thalamus p>0.2 6.68, 0.012 p>0.2

F statistics and p values for ANCOVAs controlling for ICV, age and gender comparing brain regional grey matter volumes between groups. HR−C are seen to show volumetric deficits compared to HC and HR+C groups. HR+C showed trend-level deficits compared to HC for right angular and superior parietal cortices. (see Fig. 2).