Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 30;69(14):5630–5633. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1055

Table 1.

Significant sample type effects on copy number alterations in GBM

(A)
206 TCGA
primary tumors
12 primary
tumors
10 primary
cultures
15 xenografts 21
cell lines
50 Sanger
CGP cell lines

High-level amplifications
EGFR 43% 83% 10% 40% 5% 2%
CDK4/6 16% 8% 0% 13% 5% 4%
MDM2/4 15% 17% 10% 13% 10% 4%
PDGFRA 11% 17% 0% 7% 0% 2%
CCND1/D2/D3 4% 8% 0% 7% 5% 2%
Genomic deletions
CDKN2A/B 55% 58% 60% 87% 81% 70%
PTEN 8% 8% 10% 7% 14% 18%
CDKN2C 3% 0% 10% 27% 19% 20%
NF1 2% 0% 0% 7% 5% 8%
(B)
Genomic deletions
CDKN2A 1.0 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1
PTEN 1.0 ± 0.3 0.7* 0.2* 0.2* 0.5 ± 0.4
CDKN2C 1.1 ± 0.3 0.4* 1.1 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.3
NF1 1.4 ± 0.2 0.3* 0.3*

NOTE: A, percentage of tumor samples with focal (<10 Mb) genomic deletion and high-level (copy number >7) focal amplification of the indicated gene loci. B, mean copy number and SD at the indicated gene loci in those tumor samples with focal genomic deletion. Two-tailed unpaired t test analysis was used to compare the statistical significance of any difference in frequency of copy number alteration (A) and mean copy number (B) between the TCGA primary tumors and other GBM tumor samples. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in frequency (A) and copy number means (B) are highlighted in boldface. —, no samples with focal genomic deletion at the indicated gene loci.

*

, less than three samples with genomic deletion, no SD calculation or t test analysis possible.