Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):64–74. doi: 10.1037/a0022199

Table 3.

Multiple regression analysis predicting patients’ post-transplant distress (N = 230)

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Variable B SE B SE B SE B SE
Intercept .39 .03*** .39 .03*** .44 .03*** .46 .03***
Femalea .17 .05*** .17 .05*** .06 .05 .06 .05
Age −.01 .002** −.01 .002** −.01 .002** −.01 .002**
Income −.02 .01 −.02 .01 −.02 .01 −.03 .01*
Physical functioning −.02 .002*** −.02 .002*** −.01 .002*** −.01 .002***
Partner support quantity -- -- −.05 .04 .11 .05* .08 .05
Partner social support effectiveness (SSE) -- -- -- -- −.01 .002*** −.01 .002***
Partner support quantity * Partner SSE -- -- -- -- -- -- −.005 .01**

ΔF for step 23.60*** 1.43 45.37*** 6.98*
R2 for step .30 .00 .12 .02
F or full model 24.53***
R2 for full model .44

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001

a

Coded 1 = female, 0 = male to indicate the survivor’s sex.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure