Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep 7;20(11):2985–2998. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1563-z

Table 2.

Major efficacy outcomes

Intervention Control Effect size (95% CI) I2 p-value
Events/ n % Events/ n %
SRE INCIDENCE RR for reduced
SREs
Zoledronic acid vs. placebo
  Kritikosc [34] 10/26 38 13/26 50 0.77 (0.41-1.4)
Zoledronic acid + chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy
  Zarogoulidis[31, 35] 4/87 5 3/57 5 0.87 (0.20-3.8)
  Rosen [7] [6] [27] 124/259 48 74/123 60 0.80 (0.66-0.96)
  Hirai [36] 15/50 30 20/50 39 0.75 (0.44-1.3)
  Scagliottid [37-39] 5/226 2 3/211 1 0.74 (0.39-1.4)
Pooled M-H 148/622 24 100/441 23 0.81(0.67-0.97) 0 0.02
Zoledronic acid vs. ibandronate
  Francini [25] 5/26 19 7/27 30 0.74 (0.27-2.0)

PAIN CONTROL RR for better pain control
Clodronate vs. radioisotope
  Su [30] 23/28 82 16/19 84 0.98 (0.75-1.3)
  Li [28] 8/15 53 9/16 56 0.95 (0.50-1.8)
Pooled M-H 31/43 72 25/35 71 0.97 (0.74-1.3) 0 0.80
Bisphosphonate alone (clodronate or pamidronate) vs. other modalities a
  Su [30] 23/28 82 16/19 84 0.98 (0.75-1.3)
  Li [28] 8/15 53 64/102 63 0.85 (0.52-1.4)
  Zhang [29] 11/13 85 33/40 83 1.0 (0.78-1.4)
Pooled M-H 42/56 75 113/161 70 0.95 (0.78-1.2) 0 0.62
Bisphosphonate combined (clodronate or pamidronate) vs. other modalities b
  Su [30] 18/20 90 16/19 84 1.1 (0.84-1.4)
  Li [28] 18/24 75 64/102 63 1.2 (0.91-1.6)
  Zhang [29] 24/27 89 33/40 83 1.1 (0.89-1.3)
  Zheng [32] 41/46 89 16/25 64 1.4 (1.0-1.9)
Pooled M-H 101/117 86 129/186 69 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 0 0.01
Bisphosphonate (combined) vs. bisphosphonate (alone)
  Su [30] 18 /20 90 23/28 82 1.1 (0.87-1.4)

  Li [28] 18/24 75 8/15 53 1.4 (0.83-2.4)

  Zhang [29] 24/27 89 11/13 85 1.1 (0.80-1.4)

Pooled M-H 60/71 85 48/56 86 1.2 (0.96-1.4) 0 0.14
Zoledronic acid vs. ibandronate
  Francini [25] 11/18 61 9/16 56 1.1 (0.62-1.9)
Ibandronate vs. clodronate
  Guo [26] 36/46 78 31/42 74 1.1(0.88-1.4)
SURVIVAL Mean difference (days)
Zoledronic acid + chemotherapy vs.
chemotherapy
n days e n days e
  Zarogoulidis [31, 35] 87 578 57 384 194.0 (80.9-307.2)
  Rosen [7][6][27] 259 187 123 157 30.0 (−65.6-125.6)
  Pandyaf [33] 100 266 52 206 60.0 (−108.2-228.2)
Hirai [36] 50 312 50 291 21.0 (−61.7-103.7)
Pooled I-V 496 282 72.0 (−8.9-152.9) 55 0.08
TIME TO DISEASE PROGRESSION Mean difference (days)
Zoledronic acid + chemotherapy vs.
chemotherapy
n days e n days e
  Zarogoulidis [31, 35] 87 265 144 150 115.0 (47.9-182.1)
  Pandya [33] 100 132 150 131 0.00 (−0.04-0.04)
  Hirai [36] 50 81 100 78 3.0 (−39.4-45.4)
  Scagliottid [37-39] 226 270 437 339 −69.0 (−109.8- −28.2)
Pooled I-V 463 831 5.2 (−41.5-51.9) 87 0.83

n= sample size; SRE, Skeletal Related Events; M-H, Mantel-Haenzel; I-V, Inverse Variance;

a

Other modalities include: chemotherapy, radiation and /or radioisotopes;

b

Combined: bisphosphonates with chemotherapy, radiation and/or radioisotopes;

c

Assuming total number of patients equally distributed between groups;

d

All patients had completed primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy);

e

Median survival time in days; fDid not include patients with bone metastases.