Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):430–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01330.x

Table 6.

Differences in Analgesic Agent Use and Route of Administration, Pre- and Post-Implementation of Analgesic Protocols, and Between Study Sites

Variable Pre (%) Post (%) P value
Hydromorphone
 Overall 46.3 58.0 <0.001
 Site 1 71.9 63.0 0.008
 Site 2 20.0 42.2 <0.001
 Site 3 38.8 64.1 <0.001
Hydromorphone and NSAIDS
 Overall 1.1 4.3 <0.001
 Site 1 1.0 11.3 <0.001
 Site 2 1.3 0.2 NS
 Site 3 1.0 2.1 NS
Morphine Sulfate
 Overall 41.7 29.3 <0.001
 Site 1 24.1 20.4 NS
 Site 2 53.5 53.8 NS
 Site 3 54.6 20.5 <0.001
Oral
 Overall 2.5 4.3 0.028
 Site 1 2.7 3.1 0.735
 Site 2 0.4 0.4 NS
 Site 3 4.6 7.4 NS
Intravenous
 Overall 65.6 60.8 0.021
 Site 1 58.9 54.0 NS
 Site 2 98.3 90.2 <0.001
 Site 3 37.1 47.4 0.007
Intramuscular
 Overall 28.9 29.4 0.786
 Site 1 32.0 29.7 NS
 Site 2 0.9 8.1 <0.001
 Site 3 57.4 41.9 <0.001
Subcutaneous
 Overall 2.8 5.1 0.008
 Site 1 6.4 13.2 0.002
 Site 2 0.4 1.4 NS
 Site 3 0 2.2 0.036

NSAIDS = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; NS = not significant

There was an overall decrease in the use of morphine sulfate and increase in the use of hydromorphone. Sites 2 and 3 had the largest increase in the use of hydromorphone.