Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;75(5):921–933. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0454-9

Table 1.

Results of the two-way within-subjects ANOVA of the four crossed conditions in the main experiment: Forward masking with enumeration, forward masking with change detection, backward masking with enumeration, and backward masking with change detection

Factor df 1 df 2 F p < η p 2
Forward Masking–Enumeration
SOA 3 45 94.912 .001 .864
Set Size 1.749 26.230 49.475 .001 .767
SOA × Set Size 5.576 83.643 1.710 .135 .102
Forward Masking–Change Detection
SOA 3 45 9.222 .001 .381
Set Size 2 30 63.330 .001 .809
SOA × Set Size 6 90 2.392 .035 .138
Backward Masking–Enumeration
SOA 1.529 22.935 56.031 .001 .789
Set Size 1.530 22.958 64.574 .001 .811
SOA × Set Size 3.801 57.020 12.490 .001 .454
Backward Masking–Change Detection
SOA 3 45 34.722 .001 .698
Set Size 2 30 130.376 .001 .897
SOA × Set Size 6 90 2.784 .017 .157

For each of a condition’s main and interaction effects, the degrees of freedom of the numerator, the degrees of freedom of the denominator, the F value, the significance level, and the goodness of fit of the general linear model are displayed.