. 2013 Jul;132(1):e201–e210. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0886

TABLE 4.

Secondary Weight Outcomes for Community-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Studies in High-Income Countries (n = 9)

Study, Year	Secondary Outcome	Measurement of Secondary Outcome at Follow-up		Magnitude of Change From Baseline^a	Significance of Change From Baseline^a
Study, Year	Secondary Outcome	Control	Intervention	Magnitude of Change From Baseline^a	Significance of Change From Baseline^a
Chang, 2010³⁰	NR
Chomitz, 2010²⁴	NR
de Silva-Sanigorski, 2010³¹	Servings of vegetables	NR	NR	0.10	P = .07
de Silva-Sanigorski, 2010³¹	Servings of fruit	NR	NR	0.07	P = .14
Economos, 2007²⁹	NR
Eiholzer, 2010²³	Change in physical activity (SpAEE), kcal/min	−0.01	0.23	NR	P = .02
Eiholzer, 2010²³	Change in physical activity (TrAEE), kcal/min	−0.21	0.30	NR	P = .48
Sallis, 2003²⁵	Student fatty foods	Boys: 9.7	Boys:8.9	Boys: –0.13	Boys: P = .76
	Student fatty foods	Girls: 8.2	Girls: 8.0	Girls: –0.03	Girls: P = .94
	Moderate to vigorous physical activity	Boys: 104	Boys: 115	Boys: 0.09	Boys: P = .84
	Moderate to vigorous physical activity	Girls: 91	Girls: 93	Girls: 0.25	Girls: P = .55
	Sedentary h/d/student	Boys:3.87	Boys: 4.42	Boys: 0.17	Boys: P = .69
	Sedentary h/d/student	Girls:4.61	Girls: 4.64	Girls: 0.11	Girls: P = .71
Singh, 2009²⁶	Change in SSB consumption (mL/d)	714	689	−88	CI (–203 to 28)
	Active commuting to school, min/d	42	46	−2	CI (–10 to 5)
	Screen-viewing behavior (television viewing and computer use), min/d	248	258	−2	CI (–9 to 5)
Klesges, 2010²⁸ ^b	Mean total energy intake, kcal	NR	NR	−78	CI (–186.3 to 31.1)
	Servings of vegetables	NR	NR	0.2	CI (–0.0 to 0.3)
	Servings of fruit	NR	NR	−0.0	CI (–0.2 to 0.2)
	Moderate to vigorous activity, min	NR	NR	0.6	CI (–1.3 to 2.4)
Robinson, 2010²⁷ ^b	Mean total energy intake, kcal	NR	NR	−27.3	CI (–69.9 to 15.0)
	Weekday accelerometer counts, counts/min	NR	NR	3.18	CI (–11.6 to 17.9)
	Weekly total screen time, h	NR	NR	−2.65	CI (–5.42 to 0.13)

NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; SpAEE, spontaneous physical activity energy expenditure; SSB, sugar sweetened beverages; TrAEE, training activity energy expenditure.

Control vs intervention.

The comparison group is an active intervention. For the Kelsges et al study, group behavioral counseling (obesity prevention program) is compared with self-esteem and social efficacy (alternative intervention). For the Robinson et al study, dance classes and reduced screen use are compared with health education.