Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 14;105(8):546–550. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt017

Table 3.

Twelve-year prostate cancer mortality (95% confidence interval) for observed and modeled Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT)*

Subgroup
(version)
Watchful waiting Radical prostatectomy Absolute mortality difference
PIVOT Model PIVOT Model PIVOT Model
Not screen detected
(baseline)
16.7%
(16.6% to 16.8%)
12.1%
(12.0% to 12.1%)
4.6%
(4.4% to 4.8%)
Not overdiagnosed
(baseline)
6.0%
(3.9% to 8.1%)
3.1%
(1.1% to 5.1%)
2.9%
(0.7% to 5.1%)
Overall
(baseline)
7.4% 7.9%
(5.2% to 10.6%)
4.4% 5.9%
(3.5% to 8.3%)
3.0% 2.0%
(−1.6% to 5.6%)
Overall
(sensitivity analysis 1)
7.4% 7.8%
(5.1% to 10.6%)
4.4% 6.0%
(3.5% to 8.5%)
3.0% 1.8%
(−1.7% to 5.5%)
Overall
(sensitivity analysis 2)
7.4% 7.3%
(5.2% to 9.4%)
4.4% 5.6%
(3.4% to 7.8%)
3.0% 1.7%
(−1.7% to 5.1%)

* Model results are averages over 500 000 simulations. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals are based on the uncertainty ranges in overdiagnosis and mean lead times shown in Table 2. Baseline results assume exponential lead time distributions and cause-specific survival. Sensitivity analysis 1 replaces exponential with Weibull lead time distributions (see Supplementary Material, available online). Sensitivity analysis 2 replaces exponential with shifted exponential cause-specific survival (see Supplementary Material, available online). — = not available from published data.