Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):205–214. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340

Table 1.

Characteristics of CHAT Participants in 8 States 1999–2009 (N = 4264)a

Characteristics North Carolina Minnesota Californiab Texas Oklahoma Montana Ohio North Dakotac
No. of groups 50 59 166 20 81 8 18
No. of participants 562 619 1794 190 687 94 179 139
Year 1999 2001 2002–2007 2004–2005 2007–2008 2008 2008 2009
Gender
 Male, % 53 33 37 34 34 48 32 38
Age (mean or range), y
 Mean ± SD 47 ± 19 42 ± 12 41 ± 11
 18–39 41 48 29 24 13
 40–59 49 43 51 61 56
 60 and above 10 9 19 16 30
Ethnicityd
 Asian 0 1 8 0 0 1 1
 African American 40 0 9 27 15 0 34
 Hispanic/Latino 0 0 11 21 7 0 3
 White 56 94 68 52 66 95 56
 Other 2 5 6 0 19 4 7
Education level
 High school and below 37 12 11 40 30 19 52
 Some college 25 27 30 31 46 34 35
 College and above 39 61 59 29 24 47 13
Income level,e %
 Low 45 1 18 16 23 5 73 24
 Middle 55 42 33 49 36 38 26 27
 High 58 48 34 41 3 49
Insurance status
 Uninsured, % 22 0 10 100 19 3 96 14
a

Colorado had approximately 100 participants, but data are not shown because they are not accurately known.

b

Results for California reflect 4 projects combined as described in the text.

c

Information about ethnicity and education was not collected in North Dakota.

d

Ethnicity is expressed in percentage and may add up to more than 100 because participants may identify with more than 1 ethnicity.

e

Income categories differed slightly among projects, with the low range varying from less than 15 000 to less than 21 000, and the high range always defined as greater than 60 000 and are expressed as percentages of participants with incomes in the given range, dollar amounts are multiples of $10,000.