Skip to main content
. 2013 May 21;41(Web Server issue):W123–W128. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt418

Table 3.

Ab initio gene prediction accuracy results of WebAUGUSTUS with web-trained and expert-trained parameters

Scenario Trainer Gene level
Exon level
Nucleotide level
Sens. Spec. #Anno #Pred Sens. Spec. #Anno #Pred Sens. Spec. #Anno #Pred
optA web 46.3 37.2 5660 7099 67.6 57.8 24 846 29 082 90.3 69.8 9 387 473 12 157 611
Expert 49.0 40.3 6897 71.5 56.8 31 241 93.2 67.0 13 053 363
optB Web 56.8 45.7 13 535 16 843 82.0 72.5 73 625 83 234 96.4 76.1 16 504 394 20 906 994
Expert 58.9 46.4 16 920 83.1 71.2 85 883 96.9 75.3 21 226 128
optC Web 37.2 39.3 9992 9450 74.8 76.0 63 286 62 301 90.0 87.1 12 394 167 12 791 466
Expert 32.4 36.8 8794 71.7 75.6 60 111 87.7 87.5 12 420 039

Accuracy was measured by comparing predicted genes to existing annotations. Parameters were optimized using the three different approaches that are available at WebAUGUSTUS: training AUGUSTUS with gene structures that were generated in a fully automated way from ESTs (optA, D. melanogaster) or protein (optB, A. thaliana) sequences, and training AUGUSTUS with externally generated gene structures (optC, C. elegans). For each scenario, we show accuracy results that were obtained using WebAUGUSTUS, and in a row below, the accuracy results obtained with already existing parameter sets that were generated by experts.

Spec., Specificity; Sens., Sensitivity; #Anno, number of annotated features; #Pred, number or predicted features.