Skip to main content
. 2013 May 2;41(Web Server issue):W379–W383. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt331

Table 1.

Comparison of models of 15 transmembrane domains built by Memoir (high-accuracy model), HHpred and Swiss-Model

Target/template % id % Cova RMSDb
Memoir HHpred Swiss-Model
2Q7MC/2H8AA 10 57 4.07 3.63 3.76
2JMMA/2LHFA 13 62 3.85 3.85 5.29
3GIAA/3L1LA 15 93 3.97 4.20 4.81
3O0RB/3MK7A 18 92 3.18 2.64 2.91
1OGVM/2AXTa 19 59 2.60 5.06 3.39
2VL0A/3RHWA 22 93 2.61 2.58 2.64
3BRYA/3DWOX 23 84 4.25 3.67 3.55
2WIEA/2X2VA 27 80 1.31 1.47 1.31
1YC9A/3PIKA 27 89 1.35 2.16 1.35
2D57A/2W2EA 31 97 1.80 2.06 2.02
2HYDA/3B60A 34 94 2.31 2.97 2.33
1L0LD/1ZRTD 35 89 1.30 1.54 1.28
1EZVE/2FYNC 47 65 2.11 3.72 3.01
1M56C/1OCCC 48 99 1.10 2.33 2.04
2QKSA/3SYOA 50 90 2.72 2.58 3.15
Mean 83 2.57 2.96 2.86

An entry is in bold if the RMSD for the method is >0.2 Å lower than that of the next most accurate method.

aCoverage is assessed over the transmembrane domain.

bRMSD is assessed over common residues in all the models in the transmembrane domain.