Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e67623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067623

Table 4. Overall estimates for β, the linear selection gradient, on each PC of CHC expression.

Choosiness Preference
PC1 −0.067 (−0.198–0.066) 0.083 (−0.284–0.449)
PC2 0.143 (0.275–0.013) 0.015 (−0.372–0.395)
PC3 0.516 (0.656–0.377) 0.618 (0.214–1.022)
PC4 0.401 (0.310–0.493) 0.460 (0.717–0.197)

95% credible intervals around each estimate are in brackets. Interval estimates which are significantly different from 0 are highlighted in bold. Choosiness is inferred from copulation latency data and preference from mate acceptance data. Note that consistent sexual selection will have the opposite sign for choosiness and preference.