Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec 31;28(2):443–456. doi: 10.1037/a0030967

Table 1.

Grand-Mean (±SE) Accuracy Rates, Memory Sensitivity (Pr), Response Bias (Br), and Number of Words Recalled for the Full Attention (FA), Divided Attention Early (DA1), and Divided Attention Late (DA2) Recognition Tests

Encoding condition %Olds Pr* Br* Free recall
FA 87.3 (1.8) .73 (.03) .46 (.06) 12.2 (0.9)
DA1 (300–850 ms) 76.3 (2.6) .61 (.03) .39 (.04) 7.8 (0.9)
DA2 (850–1,400 ms) 75.3 (2.8) .58 (.03) .41 (.05) 8.2 (1.0)
Nessler et al. (2006) older adults 70.8 (4.1) .57 (.04) .34 (.07)
Nessler et al. (2006) young adults 81.1 (2.6) .73 (.03) .29 (.04)

Note. Older and young adult data from the high-selection condition of Nessler et al. (2006) are shown for comparison. %Olds = % old words correctly recognized; Pr = hits – false alarms; Br = false alarms/[1 – (hits – false alarms)]; (Snodgrass & Corwin, 1988).

*

All values significantly different from zero via t test (ps < .0001).