Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul;38(4):222–231. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120111

Table 1.

Characteristics of included consolidation studies

Study Materials Participants, propranolol:placebo Sex, % Age, mean (SD) [range] yr Study protocol Outcome measures

Male Female
Cahill et al.11 Emotional slide story 11:8 47 53 27.4 (27.6) 40 mg 60 min before encoding % recognition story phase 2
van Stegeren et al.40 Emotional slide story 14:13 31 69 Undergraduates 40 mg 60 min before encoding % recognition story phase 2
O’Carroll et al.19 Emotional slide story 12:12 17 83 21.4 (2.45) 40 mg 60 min before encoding % recognition story phase 2
Reist et al.27 Emotional slide story 5:5 100 44.45 (8.08) 40 mg 60–90 min before encoding % recognition phase 2
Reist et al.27* Emotional slide story 5:4 100 50.53 (8.5) 40 mg 60–90 min before encoding % recognition story phase 2
van Stegeren et al.37 Emotional slide story 15:15 23 77 22.65 40 mg immediately before encoding % recognition story phase 2
Maheu et al.41 experiment 1 Emotional slide story 11:13 100 [19–36] 40 mg 65 min before encoding % free recall story phase 2
Maheu et al.41 experiment 2 Emotional slide story 14:13 100 [20–34] 80 mg 90 min before encoding % free recall story phase 2
Strange and Dolan42 Emotionally valenced words 12:12 50 50 [20–39] 40 mg 90 min before encoding; memory test 10 h later % recognition word list
Grillon et al.43 Fear conditioning 15:15 46 53 29 (2.8) 40 mg 60 min before conditioning Retention fear conditioning
van Stegeren et al.38 Emotionally valenced pictures; crossover design 28:28 50 50 20.93 (2.38) 80 mg 90 min before encoding; memory test 2 wk later % recognition pictures
Weymar et al.44 Emotionally valenced pictures 23:23 100 [19–31] 80 mg 90 min before encoding % recognition pictures

SD = standard deviation.

*

Posttraumatic stress disorder population; data excluded from statistical analysis.

Data excluded from statistical analysis.