Table 3.

Difference in BOLD activity in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food by energy balance group¹in Study 2.

	x, y, z	k	Z value	r
Milkshake cue > Tasteless solution cue
Negative energy balance > positive energy balance group
Precuneus	−6, −64, 34	14	3.73	0.41
Medial prefrontal cortex	−12, 41, 25	26	3.70	0.41
Ventral anterior cingulate cortex	9, 26, 16	11	3.38	0.43
Negative energy balance > energy stable group
Cuneus	−18, −79, 31	33	4.07	0.45
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex	−33, 41, 31	46	3.95	0.44
Posterior cingulate cortex	−6, −31, 49	12	3.45	0.38
Milkshake receipt > Tasteless solution receipt
Negative energy balance > positive energy balance group
Caudate	−21, −1, 19	13	4.06	0.45
Precentral gyrus	9, −13, 61	31	3.90	0.43
Negative energy balance > energy stable group
Caudate	−21, −1, 22	12	4.71	0.52
	21, 8, 22	11	4.22	0.47
Hippocampus	39, −25, −14	21	3.97	0.44
Middle occipital gyrus	−15, −91, −5	15	3.60	0.40
Fusiform gyrus	−27, −76, −8	28	3.58	0.40

¹Significant at P < 0.05 whole brain corrected for multiple comparisons

BOLD = Blood oxygen level dependent, x,y,z = MNI coordinates, k = cluster size, r = effect size.