Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;207(9):1389–1396. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit030

Table 2.

Geometric Mean Ratios (GMRs) of Paired Data From Study Interventions

Variable Intervention Comparison, GMR (95% CI)
N-9 vs Normosol-R N-9 vs CS + BX CS + BX vs Normosol-R
Plasma 99mTc AUC 8.3 (4.7–15.6)a 5.7 (3.4–9.4)a 1.5 (.7–3.3)
Plasma 99mTc Cmax 12.0 (6.8–21.0)a 8.4 (5.2–13.5)a 1.4 (.7–3.1)
Plasma 99mTc Tmax 0.21 (.15–.28)a 0.40 (.25–.66)a 0.52 (.29–.94)a
Urine 99mTc level, h after intervention receipt
0–2 12.2 (6.3–23.6)a 5.0 (3.1–8.2)a 2.4 (1.0– 5.8)a
2–4 5.0 (2.1–11.8)a 4.0 (1.4–11.4)a 1.3 (.5–3.8)
4–8 3.6 (1.1–11.4)a 1.6 (.7–3.4) 2.3 (.5–9.6)
8–12 2.8 (.7–10.6) 1.7 (.7–4.1) 1.7 (.4–7.8)
12–24 1.9 (.8–4.7) 1.7 (.6–4.8) 1.2 (.4–4.3)

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; Cmax, maximum concentration; CS + BX, Normosol-R plus coital simulation and endoscopic biopsy; N-9, nonoxynol-9; Tmax, time to maximum concentration; 99mTc, 99mtechnetium.

a P < .05, using the t test for pairwise comparison.