Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2011 May 23;24(10):1380–1391. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1701

Table 2.

Summary of relevant parameters for the calibration tumors investigated in this study. The enhancement is denoted by strong (S) or medium (M).

Tumor Matrix Size Enh. Volume / mm3 Slope Intercept Mean r1 ± STD
(mM−1 s−1)
1 128 ×128 S 50.4 0.0059 −0.0145 1.96 ± 4.93
2 128 ×128 S 124 0.0264 −0.0654 3.04 ± 0.11
3 256 ×256 S 73.5 0.0037 0.0111 3.02 ± 0.080
4 256 ×256 M 100 0.0104 0.0018 3.04 ± 18.9
5 256 ×256 M 187 0.0255 0.0127 12.3 ± 68.3
6 256 ×256 M 65.1 0.0066 0.1409 3.22 ± 1.49
7 128 ×128 S 209 0.0386 −0.0626 3.06 ± 0.12
8 128 ×128 M 70.8 0.0105 −0.0329 3.06 ± 0.12
9 128 ×128 S 68.3 0.0099 0.0037 0.098 ± 20.1
10 128 ×128 M 41.0 0.0077 0.0039 3.4 ± 1.67

Mean 0.0101 0.0027

The correlation coefficient between tumor volume and slope is 0.91 with a p-value of 2.2×10−4.