Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e67345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067345

Table 3. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for mtDNA and cpDNA in Pinus yunnanensis.

Source of variation d.f. SS Variancecomponents Percentageof variation F-statistics
mtDNA
Among 16 populations 15 90.003 0.358 55.48** F ST = 0.55**
Within populations 239 68.750 0.288 44.52
Total 254 158.753 0.646
Among 7 SAMOVA groups 6 85.411 0.413 57.77** F CT = 0.58**
Among populations within groups 9 4.592 0.014 1.96** F SC = 0.05**
Within populations 239 68.750 0.288 40.27** F ST = 0.60**
Total 254 158.753 0.714
Among 3 ecotypes 2 40.262 0.267 34.41** F CT = 0.34**
Among populations within ecotypes 13 49.741 0.222 28.58** F SC = 0.44**
Within populations 239 68.750 0.288 37.01** F ST = 0.63**
Total 254 158.753 0.777
cpDNA Among 16 populations 15 19.913 0.045 6.94** F ST = 0.07**
within populations 239 144.950 0.606 93.06
Total 254 164.863 0.652
Among 3 ecotypes 2 5.265 0.025 3.72** F CT = 0.04*
Among populations within ecotypes 13 14.648 0.033 4.92** F SC = 0.05**
Within populations 239 144.950 0.606 91.36** F ST = 0.09**
Total 254 164.863 0.664
*

P<0.05;

**

P<0.01.