Table 3. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for mtDNA and cpDNA in Pinus yunnanensis.
Source of variation | d.f. | SS | Variancecomponents | Percentageof variation | F-statistics | |
mtDNA | ||||||
Among 16 populations | 15 | 90.003 | 0.358 | 55.48** | F ST = 0.55** | |
Within populations | 239 | 68.750 | 0.288 | 44.52 | ||
Total | 254 | 158.753 | 0.646 | |||
Among 7 SAMOVA groups | 6 | 85.411 | 0.413 | 57.77** | F CT = 0.58** | |
Among populations within groups | 9 | 4.592 | 0.014 | 1.96** | F SC = 0.05** | |
Within populations | 239 | 68.750 | 0.288 | 40.27** | F ST = 0.60** | |
Total | 254 | 158.753 | 0.714 | |||
Among 3 ecotypes | 2 | 40.262 | 0.267 | 34.41** | F CT = 0.34** | |
Among populations within ecotypes | 13 | 49.741 | 0.222 | 28.58** | F SC = 0.44** | |
Within populations | 239 | 68.750 | 0.288 | 37.01** | F ST = 0.63** | |
Total | 254 | 158.753 | 0.777 | |||
cpDNA | Among 16 populations | 15 | 19.913 | 0.045 | 6.94** | F ST = 0.07** |
within populations | 239 | 144.950 | 0.606 | 93.06 | ||
Total | 254 | 164.863 | 0.652 | |||
Among 3 ecotypes | 2 | 5.265 | 0.025 | 3.72** | F CT = 0.04* | |
Among populations within ecotypes | 13 | 14.648 | 0.033 | 4.92** | F SC = 0.05** | |
Within populations | 239 | 144.950 | 0.606 | 91.36** | F ST = 0.09** | |
Total | 254 | 164.863 | 0.664 |
P<0.05;
P<0.01.