Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e67169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067169

Table 3. Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in ris-VADAs.

Variables Favorable Outcomes(n = 47) Unfavorable Outcomes(n = 10) Total(n = 57) pValue P, Regression(OR, 95% CI)
Age, y, Mean±SD 47.11±9.44 56.90±10.88 0.021 0.040 (1.090, 1.004–1.184)
Sex, n (%) 1.000
Male 24 (83) 5 (17) 29
Female 23 (82) 5 (18) 28
Hunt&Hess Scale, no. (%) 0.000 0.022 (4.289, 1.232–14.933)
I–II 39 (91) 4 (9) 43
III 8 (73) 3 (27) 11
IV 0 (0) 3 (100) 3
PICA Involvement 0.388
Yes 23 (77) 7 (23) 30
No 24 (89) 3 (11) 27
Aneurysmal Type, no. (%) 0.616
Dilatation without stenosis 26 (79) 7 (21) 33
Dilatation with stenosis 21 (88) 3 (12) 24
Blood Supply to Basilar Artery 1.000
Predominant 12 (86) 2 (14) 14
Equal 35 (81) 8 (19) 43
Maximum dimension (mm) 0.387
<10 30 (86) 5 (14) 35
10–25 16 (73) 6 (27) 22
Treatment Interval 1.000
≤72 h 31 (84) 6 (16) 37
>72 h 16 (80) 4 (20) 20
Stent(s) Implantation, no. (%) 0.434
Single stent+coils 28 (88) 4 (12) 32
Multiple stents+coils 19 (76) 6 (24) 25
Coils, no. (%) 0.069 0.210 (2.899, 0.550–15.294)
Bare Coils 33 (89) 4 (11) 37
Modified(Hydrocoil/soft) Coils 14 (70) 6 (30) 20
Obliteration Grade, no. (%) 0.694
Complete obliteration 13 (76) 4 (24) 17
Partial obliteration 34 (85) 6 (15) 40

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ris-VADAs, the ruptured intracranial spontaneous vertebral artery dissection aneurysms; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PICA, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery.