Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e66902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066902

Table 3. The gene signature from the NGS dataset using DESeq analysis and their positions in the microarray DEGs by SamR.

ProbeSetID GeneSymbol EnsemblID log2Ratio adjustedPvalue DESeqPosition SamRposition SamRlog2FC SamRq-value(%)
212789 at NCAPD3 ENSG00000151503 5.58 0 1 96 1.23 0.00
204560 at FKBP5 ENSG00000096060 5.08 0 2 30 2.04 0.00
200862 at DHCR24 ENSG00000116133 3.38 0 3 91 1.14 0.00
205876 at LIFR ENSG00000113594 4.24 4.72E-307 5 374 0.68 0.89
219555 s at CENPN ENSG00000166451 5.09 2.12E-295 6 29 1.93 0.00
222118 at CENPN ENSG00000166451 5.09 2.12E-295 6 11 2.58 0.00
218211 s at MLPH ENSG00000115648 2.69 1.29E-282 7 913 0.47 3.09
203455 s at SAT1 ENSG00000130066 2.93 1.15E-193 10 146 0.95 0.32
210592 s at SAT1 ENSG00000130066 2.93 1.15E-193 10 161 0.91 0.32
213988 s at SAT1 ENSG00000130066 2.93 1.15E-193 10 148 0.95 0.32

The list of identifiers and their associated genes extracted from the NGS dataset using DESeq analysis and put to the sscMap. We established where these genes were located in full list (Table S3) of statistically differentially expressed genes returned by the SamR analysis on the microarray dataset. All these genes lay within a SamR reported FDR of Inline graphic. Table S4 also contains the signed ranks of these 10 probesetIDs in the 6 instances of reference profiles for cotinine.