Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Gerontologist. 2008 Apr;48(2):203–212. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.2.203

Table 1.

Descriptions of Participating Residents (n=1791) and RC/AL Facilities (n=189)a

Resident Variables Percent of Residents (%) or M (SD)
Distribution of residents by state
    Florida 24%
    Maryland 30%
    New Jersey 21%
    North Carolina 25%
Age (years) 84.0 (7.8)
    ≥85 51.6%
Gender (female) 75.6 %
Race (white) 90.6 %
Number of comorbid conditionsb 5.0 (2.7)
ADL Function
    Independent in 7 ADLs 57.1%
    Independent in 3 mobility-related ADLs (bed mobility, transfer, walk) 80.9%
Cognition (MDS-COGS score)c
    Intact (0-1) 40.2%
    Mild-moderately impaired (2-4) 34.7 %
    Severely impaired (5-8) 19.3 %
    Very severely impaired (9-10) 5.9 %
Depressed (CSD-D score > 7) 13.6 %
Facility Variables Percent of Facilities or Mean (SD)
Facility Type (n of residents)
    < 16 beds (608) 58.2%
    Traditional (568) 21.2%
    New-model (615) 20.6%
For-profit ownership 75.5%
Have an RN or LPN 65.8%
AL-EQSe 16.5 (5.1)
a

Missing values ranged 1 to 60 for resident variables and 0 to 38 for facility variables.

b

31 items of comorbidity ranged 0 – 15, higher scores indicate more comorbidity.

c

Minimum Data Set Cognition Scale; range 0-10.

d Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; range 0-38 (19 items, each scored 0-2).

e

Assisted Living Environmental Quality Score; range 5–26, higher scores indicate better environment.