Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Neurosci. 2013 Jan 10;34(6):515–524. doi: 10.1159/000345645

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences in Treatment between HI Epo immediate and sham groups, but did reveal a trend towards a Treatment effect (p =.062) between HI Epo 60 minute delay and sham groups, and a significant Treatment effect (p <.05) between HI Epo 180 minute delay and sham groups on FM sweep detection. Scores represent mean attenuated response (cued/uncued*100), and lower scores indicate better performance.