. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 27.

Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):1955–1969. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21357

Table 1b.

properties of stimuli:

	Length	Frequency	Semantic relation	Orthographic relation		Shared phonemes
	Length	Frequency	Semantic relation	Shared letters	Shared letters in the same position	Shared phonemes
Morphologic +semantic (MS)	5.13±0.77	8.97±12.99	6.12±0.48	3.59±0.62	1.75±1.3	4.16±0.94
Morphologic +semantic (MS)	4.94±0.81	8.59±14.09	6.12±0.48	3.59±0.62	1.75±1.3	4.16±0.94
Morphologic (M)	5.13±0.78	8.97±12.99	1.74±0.49	3.61±0.68	1.44±1.12	4.06±0.95
Morphologic (M)	5.14±0.89	8.31±12.26	1.74±0.49	3.61±0.68	1.44±1.12	4.06±0.95
Orthographic (O)	5.13±0.78	8.97±±12.99	1.42±0.35	3.28±0.51	1.47±1.03	3.61±0.96
Orthographic (O)	5.15±0.79	6.21±10.38	1.42±0.35	3.28±0.51	1.47±1.03	3.61±0.96
Semantic (S)	5.13±0.78	8.97±±12.99	5.76±0.49	1.4±0.96	0.43±0.67	1.96±1.36
Semantic (S)	4.92±0.83	8.01±12.17	5.76±0.49	1.4±0.96	0.43±0.67	1.96±1.36
Control (NR)	5.13±0.78	8.97±±12.99	1.3±0.25	1.03±0.79	0.23±0.49	1.66±0.96
Control (NR)	4.84±0.72	8.03±11.1	1.3±0.25	1.03±0.79	0.23±0.49	1.66±0.96

Since we were constrained to a reasonable length for an imaging experiment, we could not achieve a probability of 0.5 to a “yes” response in the lexical decision task, but rather employed one hundred target non-words in this experiment (as