Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 19;13:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-126

Table 2.

Estimates of branch length for sister clades of parasitic (P) and autotrophic (non-parasitic, NP) plants for chloroplast sequences

Comparison Parasitic clade Non-parasite 16S rRNA ( rrn16 )
Protein-coding (all)
Comb.
dN
dS
dN/dS
P NP Sign P NP Sign Sign P NP Sign P NP Sign P NP Sign
1
Apodanthaceae
Malvaceae
1.637
0.013
+
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
Cytinaceae
Thymelaeaceae
0.091
0.008
+
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
Rafflesiaceae
Passifloraceae/ Euphorbiaceae
0.150
0.091
+
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
Cynomoriaceae
Hamamelidacea/ Peridiscaceae
0.083
0.002
+
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
Krameriaceae
Zygophyllaceae
 
 
 
0.098
0.164


0.032
0.070

0.296
0.360

0.112
0.220

6
Mitrastemonaceae
Vaccinieae
0.196
0.940

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
Boraginaceae
Boraginaceae
 
 
 
0.076
0.019
+
+
0.040
0.017
+
0.133
0.040
+
0.297
0.423

8
Orobanchaceae
Plantaginaceae
0.027
0.001
+
0.561
0.366
+
+
0.413
0.206
+
0.960
0.743
+
0.409
0.268
+
9
Convolvulaceae
Convolvulaceae/ Ipomoeeae
0.014
0.001
+
0.724
0.052
+
+
0.115
0.027
+
1.938
0.151
+
0.047
0.102

10
Lauraceae
Lauraceae
 
 
 
0.344
0.122
+
+
0.235
0.116
+
0.526
0.137
+
0.320
0.721

11
Hydnoraceae
Aristolochiaceae
0.336
0.000
+
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12
Santalaceae/ Olacaceae
Strombosiaceae
 
 
 
0.125
0.049
+
+
0.068
0.039
+
0.241
0.069
+
0.239
0.585

Wilcoxon rank sign test
Z = 1.47, p = 0.14
Z = 1.68, p = 0.09
 
Z = 1.47, p = 0.14
Z = 1.89, p = 0.06
Z = −1.26, p = 0.21
Signs test     p = 0.039      

For details of the species and sequences included in each comparisons see Additional file 3: Table S3. Protein-coding branch lengths were estimated for all substitutions (all), nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous substitutions (dS): see methods for details. Sign indicates whether the parasite has the longer branch length (+) or not (−). The Wilcoxon ranked signs test takes into account the magnitude of differences in branch length as well as the sign. Because most comparisons had only 16S or the protein-coding genes, we combined the two (Comb.) to assess the pattern over all comparisons using a signs test: for this test we considered only the direction of the rate difference for each comparison, whether calculated from 16S or protein coding genes or both.