Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 12;2013:369479. doi: 10.1155/2013/369479

Table 5.

Effect of domestic processing on FRAP activity of commonly consumed green leafy vegetables.

Sl. no. Common name Botanical name FRAP (mg/100 g FeSO4 Eq.)
Raw Conventional Pressure  Microwave
1 Amaranth Amaranthus gangeticus 8237.6a
(100)
11370b
(138)
12102b
(146)
11786b
(143)
2 Ambat chukka Rumex vesicarius 3511.6
(100)
3270
(93)
2946
(83)
3243
(92)
3 Coriander leaves Coriandrum sativum 7125.6a
(100)
18636b
(261)
16123c
(226)
19802d
(277)
4 Curry leaves Murraya koenigii 20275.0a
(100)
18533b
(91)
24213c
(119)
27392d
(135)
5 Fennel leaves Foeniculum vulgare 9238.6a
(100)
10128a
(109)
9970a
(107)
13362b
(144)
6 Fenugreek leaves Trigonella foenum-graecum 3409.6a
(100)
3919b
(114)
4799c
(140)
5429d
(159)
7 Purslane leaves Portulaca oleracea 2863.3a
(100)
4327b
(151)
4800c
(167)
4030b
(140)
8 Gogu Hibiscus cannabinus 5254.0
(100)
7274
(138)
6921
(131)
7107
(135)
9 Mint Mentha spicata 27827.6a
(100)
42562b
(152)
48909b,c
(175)
50401c
(181)
10 Ponnaganti Alternanthera sessilis 5068.3
(100)
4280
(84)
4837
(95)
4327 
(85)
11 Spinach Spinacia oleracea 1380.6a
(100)
3196b
(231)
3471b
(251)
3502b
(253)

Mean values were compared (n = 3) by nonparametric Kruskal wallis one way ANOVA. Differences in alphabets are significantly different at  P < 0.05. Percent gain or loss calculated when raw value taken as 100%. Percent recovery values are given in parentheses. Decimal points are not given due to higher numbers.