Table 4.

Genome-scale model validation results

KEGG ID	Species name	AUC	Citation
ani	Aspergillus nidulans	0.56	David et al., 2008
ath	Arabidopsis thaliana	0.57	de Oliveira Dal’Molin et al., 2010
bsu	Bacillus subtilis	0.61	Oh et al., 2007
buc	Buchnera aphidicola	0.68	Thomas et al., 2009
det	Dehalococcoides ethenogenes	0.60	Islam et al., 2010
eco	E.coli K-12	0.55	Reed et al., 2003
hsl	Halobacterium salinarum	0.60	Gonzalez et al., 2008
lpl	Lactobacillus plantarum	0.64	Teusink et al., 2006
mge	M.genitalium	0.43	Suthers et al., 2009
nme	Neisseria meningitidis	0.58	Baart et al., 2007
nph	Natronomonas pharaonis	0.60	Gonzalez et al., 2010
pfa	P.falciparum	0.59	Plata et al., 2010
pgi	Porphyromonas gingivalis	0.60	Mazumdar et al., 2009
pic	Pichia stipitis	0.48	Caspeta et al., 2012
sau	Staphylococcus aureus	0.52	Lee et al., 2009
sce	S.cerevisiae	0.56	Herrgård et al., 2008
sce	S.cerevisiae	0.53	Förster et al., 2003
sco	Streptomyces coelicolor	0.64	Borodina et al., 2005
sco	S.coelicolor	0.63	Alam et al., 2010
son	Shewanella oneidensis	0.55	Pinchuk et al., 2010
syn	Synechocystis PCC6803	0.57	Nogales et al., 2012
vvu	Vibrio vulnificus	0.52	Kim et al., 2011
ypm	Yersinia pestis	0.55	Navid and Almaas, 2009
zmo	Zymomonas mobilis	0.61	Widiastuti et al., 2011

Note: The final classifier was applied to KEGG metabolic models, and the results were compared with curated genome-scale metabolic models for these species.