Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2013 Feb 4;33(2):182–191. doi: 10.1037/a0031253

Table 1.

Negative Binomial Models for Intervention × DRD4 × Target Sex Effects on Increases in Youth Substance Use

Model 1
Model 2
Estimate SE Estimate SE
Constant −1.038*** .287 −1.124*** .310
Substance use, pretest 1.268*** .155 1.367*** .149
DRD4 status 0.425** .160 −0.042 .266
Intervention status −0.105 .260
Youth gender 0.006 .348
Intervention status × DRD4 status 0.089 .407
Youth gender × DRD4 status 1.288** .458
Intervention status × youth gender 0.608 .444
Intervention status × DRD4 status × youth gender −1.398* .613
Socioeconomic risk −0.014 .028 −0.022 .028
Community risk 0.016* .008 0.019** .007

Note: The estimates presented in the table are in log(μ) metric. The standard errors (SE) presented in the table are the robust standard errors.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.