Table 1.
Negative Binomial Models for Intervention × DRD4 × Target Sex Effects on Increases in Youth Substance Use
| Model 1
|
Model 2
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | |
| Constant | −1.038*** | .287 | −1.124*** | .310 |
| Substance use, pretest | 1.268*** | .155 | 1.367*** | .149 |
| DRD4 status | 0.425** | .160 | −0.042 | .266 |
| Intervention status | −0.105 | .260 | ||
| Youth gender | 0.006 | .348 | ||
| Intervention status × DRD4 status | 0.089 | .407 | ||
| Youth gender × DRD4 status | 1.288** | .458 | ||
| Intervention status × youth gender | 0.608 | .444 | ||
| Intervention status × DRD4 status × youth gender | −1.398* | .613 | ||
| Socioeconomic risk | −0.014 | .028 | −0.022 | .028 |
| Community risk | 0.016* | .008 | 0.019** | .007 |
Note: The estimates presented in the table are in log(μ) metric. The standard errors (SE) presented in the table are the robust standard errors.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.