Table 1.
Samplea | Triangular wave potential, 1 h at RT | Detachment rate (%)b | Survival rate (%)c | Viable bacteria collection rate (%)d |
---|---|---|---|---|
Garden soil | ±10 mV, 9 MHz | 99.8 | 91 | N. D. |
Garden soil | ±8 mV, 9 MHz | 65.5 | 17 | N. D. |
Garden soil | ±6 mV, 9 MHz | 99.8 | 58 | N. D. |
Garden soil | ±4 mV, 9 MHz | 98 | 38 | N. D. |
E. coli | ±10 mV, 9 MHz | 99.6 | 83 | 88 |
B. subtilis | ±10 mV, 9 MHz | 99.7 | 47 | 48 |
N. D. not determined
aEach microorganism in PBS(−) selectively attached to the reticulated ITO electrode region to which −0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl potential was applied for 24 h at RT. Then, ±10 mV vs. Ag/AgCl 9-MHz triangular wave potential was applied for 1 h at RT
bCell numbers were counted in randomly selected 50 × 50-μm2 regions of the reticulated ITO electrode region before and after triangular wave potential application
cMore than 300 residual microorganisms on the electrodes were distinguished using a live/dead backlight bacterial viability kit after electrical detachment. Survival rates were determined by the sum of three independent experiments
dThe viable bacteria collection rate was calculated from colony numbers after triangular wave potential application divided by the total colony number. Collection rates were determined by the sum of three independent experiments