Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Soc Behav. 2012 Aug 29;53(3):313–328. doi: 10.1177/0022146512456026

Table 1.

Adjusted effectsa of patient sex/gender and physician certainty on ordering CHD medications and tests

Medications Tests only (no medications) Testsb
Urgent
Urgent Not urgent
Model 1: all design variables without physician certainty
Patient sex/gender (woman)
 Odds ratio .57 2.42 1.53 .21
 (CI)c (.34, .96) (.71, 8.27) (.91, 2.58) (.04, 1.06)
 P-value .035 .16 .11 .059
Model 2: all design variables with physician certainty
Patient sex/gender (woman)
 Odds ratio .73 2.39 1.26 .37
 (CI) (.42, 1.28) (.69, 8.29) (.73, 2.17) (.07, 2.08)
 P-value .27 .17 .41 .26
Physician certaintyd
 Odds ratio 1.41 .98 .79 1.57
 (CI) (1.23, 1.62) (.76, 1.26) (.69, .91) (1.13, 2.18)
 P-value <.001 .88 <.001 .008

Test for interaction: patient gender x physician certainty
 P-value .97 .63 .47 .73

Notes:

a

Results shown are adjusted for all design variables, including patient characteristics (age, race, SES), provider attributes (sex/gender, experience), and priming status.

b

Results for non-urgent tests are not reported due to small cell size (n=4).

c

CI = odds ratio confidence interval

d

Odds ratios and confidence intervals for physician certainty reflect a 10-point increase in certainty on a scale of 0–100. Inverse odds ratios are available upon request.