Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Aug 3;23(10):1635–1641. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0041-8

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for tea intake and prostate cancer risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study

Green tea intake
Black tea intake
Cases, n HR (95 % CI)a HR (95 % CI)b Cases, n HR (95 % CI)a HR (95 % CI)c
None 153 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref) 156 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
Monthly 33 1.06 (0.73, 1.55) 1.07 (0.73, 1.56) 22 1.17 (0.75, 1.84) 1.17 (0.75, 1.83)
Weekly 58 1.09 (0.80, 1.47) 1.09 (0.80, 1.48) 67 1.40 (1.05, 1.87) 1.40 (1.05, 1.86)
Daily 54 1.08 (0.79, 1.47) 1.08 (0.79, 1.48) 53 1.41 (1.03, 1.92) 1.41 (1.03, 1.92)
 1 cup/day 29 1.22 (0.82, 1.82) 1.22 (0.82, 1.82) 40 1.51 (1.06, 2.13) 1.50 (1.06, 2.13)
 ≥2 cups/day 25 0.95 (0.62, 1.45) 0.95 (0.62, 1.45) 13 1.17 (0.67, 2.07) 1.17 (0.67, 2.07)
p for trendd 0.6 0.6 <0.01 <0.01
p for trende 0.7 0.7 0.01 0.01

SD standard deviation

a

Adjusted models include variables for age, dialect group, interview year, education, body mass index and smoking history

b

Adjusted models include the covariates listed under (b) and black tea intake

c

Adjusted models include the covariates listed under (b) and green tea intake

d

Calculated from the model with four categories of tea intake: none, monthly, weekly, daily

e

Calculated from the model with five categories of tea intake: none, monthly, weekly, 1 cup/day, ≥2 cups/day