Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 8;53(2):222–234. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns085

Table 3.

Determinants of Intent to Stay With Job Satisfaction as Independent Variable

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
I intend to remain in my
 current position for the near
 future Three years from now,
 I would still like to be
 working as a nursing assistant Do you think you will be working
 in the field of LTC 3 years from
 now?
Coefficient (SE) Coefficient (SE) Coefficient (SE)
Job satisfaction 0.65*** (0.08) 0.39*** (0.09) 0.57*** (0.09)
Contingency factors
Breadwinner 0.27 (0.24) 0.65* (0.29) 0.47 (0.30)
Single mother -0.32 (0.25) -0.26 (0.48) 0.05 (0.32)
Public assistance 0.61* (0.27) 0.41 (0.42) 0.63* (0.32)
Health insurance -0.20 (0.27) 0.39 (0.31) -0.17 (0.32)
Constant -11.12*** (1.73)
Cut 1 5.66*** (1.52) 9.19*** (1.74)
Cut 2 7.17*** (1.52) 10.46*** (1.82)
Cut 3 9.81*** (1.65) 12.09*** (1.86)
Pseudo R2 0.17 0.12 0.2

Notes: N = 315 nursing assistants in 18 nursing home. Additional control variables are not shown in Tables 3 and 4; full tables available upon request. Models 1 and 2 are ordered logit models; Model 3 is a logit model. Specification tests confirmed that ordered logit model tests meet the proportional odds assumption. Because this study utilizes data from individuals nested within organizations, Huber White Sandwich Estimators were used in all models to correct for clustering of the error terms (Wooldridge, 2002).

*p =.05. **p = .01. ***p = .001.