Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067536

Table 3. Mean values for top models from Rosetta CSAR docking results.

Waters Protocol N Total score Ligand RMSD Water W_RMSD
Tight Standard dock 195 −1192±954 −17.93±6.5 1.06±1.79
Water dock 195 −1197±953 −20.80±7.4 1.18±2.26 −3.56±2.29 1.48±1.48
Water – Standard 195 −4.6±14.8 −2.87±2.39 0.12±1.97
Per water effect 195 −1.67±8.13 −1.61±1.28 −0.01±1.47 −2.49±2.48 0.98±1.12
Loose Standard Dock 299 −1184±968 −17.28±6.3 1.24±1.86
Water dock 299 −1193±968 −21.11±7.6 1.09±1.80 −3.20±1.86 1.60±1.38
Water – Standard 299 −8.8±16.4 −3.83±3.36 −0.15±1.69
Per water effect 299 −1.86±5.71 −1.04±0.92 −0.04±0.78 −1.32±1.29 0.65±0.84

‘Ligand’ is the component of total energy contributed by the presence of the ligand. ‘RMSD’ is calculated by comparing experimental and predicted ligand coordinates. ‘Water’ is the component of total energy contributed by the presence of waters. ‘W_RMSD’ is calculated by comparing experimental and predicted water coordinates. Rows 3 and 7 represent the difference between standard docking and ligand-centric water docking. ‘Per water effect’ reports the mean score and RMSD values after dividing individual values by the number of waters present in the study.